1.0 Rubric for individual oral presentations

Note: This rubric is experimental and (subcategories) will be more fully developed and published for Spring 2006. For now, I partitioned the rubric into categories.

100%	Individual oral presentation	Exemplary		Satisfactory		Unsatisfactory
General requirements (for all work)
-100%	Graded (Graded work)	-0%                 This submission met the minimum requirements to be graded and was graded.				-100% Another submission was graded or this submission does not meet the minimum requirements to be graded. This submission was ignored.
-100%	On-time (Delivery on-time) See Class requirements submission policy	-0%           -20% submitted correctly on-time using proper submission method (-0%=on-time, -20%=late)		-40%           -60% (-40%=more than 4 weeks late, -60%=more than 8 weeks late)		-80%          -100% not correctly submitted on-time using proper submission methed (-80%=more than 12 weeks late, -100%=more than 16 weeks late)
-30%	Effort (Good faith effort on original (for redos))	-0%           -6% original fully met requirements (functionality, content, etc.)		-12%           -18% original missing some requirements		-24%          -30% no or late original submission
-100%	Ethics (Ethics of work)	-0%           -20% few or no ethical issues		-40%           -60% some questionable ethical issues		-80%          -100% many ethical issues
Specific requirements (for this work)
-20%	Length (Length of presentation)	-0%                 within time limits				-20% too long or too short
+30%	Content (Content of presentation)	+30%           +24% Lots of content relevant/appropriate to the course. Accurate.		+18%           +12% Some relevant content. Some irrelevant content.		+6%          +0% Lots of content irrelevant or not appropriate to the course. Some inaccuracies.
+30%	Delivery (Delivery of presentation)	+30%           +24% Professional appearance, continuity, almost no reading, lots of eye contact, full of energy, etc.		+18%           +12% Satisfactory		+6%          +0% Unprofessional appearance, discontinuity, read many slides/notes, little eye contact, lack of energy, etc.
+20%	Slides (Slide support)	+20%           +16% Readable print, high contrast, appropriate text, few distractions, etc.		+12%           +8% Satisfactory		+4%          +0% Small print, poor contrast, too much text, many distractions, etc.
+20%	Structure (Structure of presentation)	+20%           +16% Easy to follow/understand logicical flow, why the topic is important, etc.		+12%           +8% Satisfactory		+4%          +0% Hard to follow/understand logicical flow, why the topic is important, etc.